WebJan 21, 2024 · FACTS: Petitioner William C. Reagan, at one time a civilian employee of an American corporation providing technical assistance to the United States Air Force in the … WebSep 9, 2014 · Herein respondents were alleged to have committed an offense of writing, publishing and circulating scurrilous libel against the Government of the U.S. and the Insular Government of the Philippine Islands in violation of Section 8, Act 292 of the Commission. The alleged libel was published in “Manila Freedom” issue dated 06 April 1902 as an ...
G.R. No. L-26379 - Lawphil
WebReagan vs. CIR CASE DIGEST; Preview text. 1. Facts: The case of Philippine National Bank vs. Fabar, Inc., et al. involves the enforcement of a solidary obligation where the plaintiff filed an action to enforce a solidary obligation against all the defendants. However, when one of the solidary debtors died, the lower court dismissed the ... WebReagan vs. CIR CASE DIGEST; Preview text. Labor Reviewer---PART I: Introductory Materials Republic act 809 is a social justice and police power measure for the promotion of labor conditions in sugar plantations, hence whatever rational degree of constraint it exerts on hildesheim fillipo
raegan v cir 30 scra 916 - digest - GR # L-26379, December...
WebReagan, a US citizen, imported a tax-free 1960 Cadillac car. Later, Reagan sold his car. As a result of the transaction, CIR assessed an income tax on Reagan amounting to P2,979. … WebJun 9, 2005 · INS, 787 F.2d 1332, 1337 (9th Cir.1986)), overruled on other grounds by 537 U.S. 1016 (2002), on remand to 326 F.3d 1316 (9th Cir.2003). We have drawn a clear distinction between “false statements made to establish the critical elements of the asylum claim [and] false statements made to evade INS officials.” WebAug 26, 2024 · After a bench trial, the district court denied Reagan and Lamar’s requests for declaratory judgment, held that the Sign Code was content neutral and satisfied intermediate scrutiny, and entered judgment for the City. Reagan and Lamar appeal. 4 Case: 19-50354 Document: 00515540542 Page: 5 Date Filed: 08/25/2024 No. 19-50354 II. smaltire smartphone