Hitting set lemma
WebJan 26, 2024 · In this work, we rederive Ta-Shma's analysis from a combinatorial point of view using repeated application of the expander mixing lemma. We hope that this alternate perspective will yield a better understanding of Ta-Shma's construction. As an additional application of our techniques, we give an alternate proof of the expander hitting set lemma. WebJan 1, 2011 · A hitting set is an independent set that intersects every maximum clique. The reduction to the cubic case in the previous proof is an immediate consequence of more general lemmas on the existence ...
Hitting set lemma
Did you know?
WebJun 30, 2024 · The H-hitting set problem is NP-complete for every connected graph H with at least two vertices. Theorem 6 follows immediately from Lemma 1 and Lemma 2 … WebJun 22, 2024 · Computing small kernels for the hitting set problem is a well-studied computational problem where we are given a hypergraph with n vertices and m hyperedges, each of size d for some small constant d, and a parameter k. The task is to compute a new hypergraph, called a kernel, whose size is polynomial with respect to the parameter k …
WebJul 17, 2024 · The classical lemma of Ore-DeMillo-Lipton-Schwartz-Zippel [Ore22,DL78,Zip79,Sch80] states that any nonzero polynomial f(x_1,..., x_n) of degree at most s will evaluate to a nonzero value at some point on a grid S^n ⊆F^n with S > s. Thus, there is an explicit hitting set for all n-variate degree s, size s algebraic circuits of size … Weba hitting set of Fif all edges in Fare hit by at least one vertex in H. Formally, H V is a hitting set of Fif and only if 8F 2F: H \F 6= ;. We call a hitting set minimum if no smaller hitting set for the same hypergraph exists. We refer to a hitting set as minimal if it contains no other hitting set as proper subset.
Weboperator whose output set is called an -hitting set. (Again take note of the “one-sided” randomness in the definition.) Definition 1.2 ( -Hitting Set). A (multi)set H f0;1gnis said … WebRado [25]. A consequence of lemma 2 is the following theorem about how small of a set we can find that is guaranteed to contain the core: Theorem3. Let C be a planted minimal hitting set with C ! kinahypergraphofrankr.Thenwecanfinda setD ofsize O(kr)that is guaranteed tocontain C.
WebSep 16, 2024 · The key idea is to use a \hitting set". Lemma 3.1. (Hitting Set) Let Sbe a collection of msets of size kover V = [n]. Fix any constant C 1. With probability at least 1 … bodyguard ambushWebJul 23, 2024 · Show that Kernel and FPT are equivalent. Will give kernel for d-Hitting Set and d-Set Packing. Will also define Sunflower Lemma. gleason hydroplane raceingWebNov 28, 2024 · The hitting set problem is the following combinatorial problem: Given a hypergraph H = (V,E) as input, consisting of a set V of vertices and a set E of hyperedges with \(e \subseteq V\) for all e ∈ E, find a set \(X\subseteq V\) of minimum size that “hits” all hyperedges e ∈ E, that is, e ∩ X≠∅.Many problems reduce to the hitting set problem, … gleason incWebRado [25]. A consequence of lemma 2 is the following theorem about how small of a set we can find that is guaranteed to contain the core: Theorem3. Let C be a planted minimal … gleason imtsWebThe hitting set and set cover problems are intimately connected; a hitting set for A is a set cover of AT. Both problems’ decision versions are NP-hard [10]. There ... Lemma and Haussler’s [11] classic Packing Lemma, that accommodate non-uniform weights. Our main innovation is to define weighted packings. For any gleason indiaWebOct 23, 2014 · Then we exit either with Case 1 or with E = ∅ and an optimal hitting set (see Lemma 5 (i)). Lemma 6 and Lemma 4 imply the following theorem. It is proved using … bodyguard and cell phoneWebThe proof relies on the new notion of a robust hitting set which is a set of inputs such that any nonzero polynomial that can be computed by a polynomial size algebraic circuit, evaluates to a not too small value on at least one element of the set. Proving the existence of such a robust hitting set is the main technical difficulty in the proof. gleason incorporated