WebMar 15, 2016 · A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. ... not a “decision”. This is deliberate terminology: it is the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) who makes the decision, whereas the AE merely recommends an outcome ... Web2 days ago · Meanwhile, President Muhammadu Buhari rejected 19 of the 35 Constitution amendment bills presented to him by the lawmakers of the National Assembly. ... Be the first to get hottest news from our Editor-in-Chief . Please use a valid email Sign up. Thank you! Check your email and confirm your subscription. You are already subscribed to our ...
被编辑拒了,rejected by editor 还能再提交吗_论文发表
WebSep 2, 2024 · An Editor-in-Chief’s Advice on ‘How to Avoid Desk Rejections of Your Manuscript’ Desk-rejection of manuscripts is a common occurrence in academic publishing. Manuscripts getting desk rejected … WebSep 10, 2015 · Answer: The status "evaluating recommendation" indicates that the paper is with the Associate Editor (AE) who will now evaluate it and decide whether the paper should be accepted, rejected, or revised. The stage is called “evaluating recommendation” because the AE can only give his recommendation to the Editor-in-chief (EiC) in this matter. brunchen bad homburg
Writing an Effective Appeal Letter to a Journal Editor
WebThe editor took this as a sign that my paper was not suitable for publication in that journal and rejected the paper. So, yes, a rejection can actually happen but it is not the rule. As … WebApr 23, 2024 · If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). Also, ‘SAE’ perhaps stands for ‘Specialist Associate Editor.’ This must be a journal-specific descriptor for the AE role. ... a rapid change to ‘Awaiting EiC Decision’ soon after submission usually means that it could be rejected ... WebDec 12, 2024 · The editor asked me to revise my paper and answer the reviewers' questions. Two of three reviewers asked me to revise some parts and agree that it is quite new and can improve it but one of them reject my paper in all parts e.g., contributions, research model. How can I response to the reviewer who rejected my paper? brunchen all you can eat berlin